I’m skeptical that would happen but there is some talk about it.
What if the presidential primary worked more like a lottery with all the states having a chance at the ultimate prize of being first to vote in the nominating schedule, ending the coveted tradition of New Hampshire and Iowa leading the pack?
According to Stateline.org that’s a simplified version of one of several ideas being considered by top party and state officials, who aim to prevent a repeat of states’ helter-skelter scramble for early presidential primary dates in 2008.
While voters in Indiana and North Carolina go to the polls today (May 6) to help Democrats pick Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama as their nominee and Republicans rally behind John McCain, party insiders and state election officials are in informal talks to improve the presidential nominating contests for 2012 and beyond.
I guess the question is what would be the best way to improve the primary process?
Fine idea. An even better one would be publicly financed 6 week campaigns–start to finish–ala the british tradition.
I suppose I’m just naive, but why don’t we all just vote on the same day? Have a date in March or early April, which gives candidates time to do all their stumping, and then let everyone vote at once. That way, everyone is voting his or her conscience, and isn’t swayed by what folks in other states have thought.
Yep, I’m incredibly naive, I know.
Katie:
How dare you, you would put all of those poor bloviators and the punditocracy in the bread lines!
I know - the media might actually have to report on… the horror!!… actual news.